My Own Private OO

I. Our “condition”

Question: My thoughts on my significant others’ and/or the general public’s awareness of OO are…

Answer: I dream about us having our own publishing press, TV station and music label (we could call it "Prism", a doubly apt name since this was the name of the record company Buddy Holly was trying to start, before he changed it to "Taupe" (I believe it was still in the planning stages when he died) ). And then we could have OO neighborhoods (only high plus or minus wearers allowed and contacts would be banned except for GOC), ophthalmologists who catered to us and did "reverse L@$!K" procedures to increase our 'scripts, opticians who were well-schooled in the art of making specs look as STRONG as possible rather than as weak, basically a whole little OO-centric world, like we have online, only out there in the real, physical world! But it has to start with each of us "coming out" in whatever way and to whomever we can and if we can only feel secure enough to do this online, well, it's a start. It does seem some non-OO people have found us (we have a Wikipedia entry and there is this Eyescene (Glasses over contacts thread) post:

So it's possible that even if we only express ourselves online, OO may still wind up slowly seeping out into the culture at large. But I do think that the more of us with the courage to discuss our feelings with friends and loved ones, the better and the sooner our "OO world" may become reality. OK, so there's my little "I have a dream speech", I know it's not exactly racial equality we're talking about here, and OOs don't have a history of being mistreated the way members of the GLBT community have, but total lack of acknowledgement can be bad enough, especially when it leads to feeling like you're terminally weird for being the only one who feels this way (as I thought as a kid), or feeling like you have this deep, dark secret you have to keep from everyone, or even just the difficulty this creates in finding like-minded people for friendships and/or romance.

On a more personal level, I am very close to my mother (I was raised an only child and didn’t have much of a father so what could I do?) and I would give anything to have her understand and accept my OOness. In the spring of 1999 (not 2000 as I’ve said before in “My History as an Optic-Obsessive”, which some of this is copied from) we got a computer and I discovered Eye Scene! I posted my email address and got a few replies, but then my mother caught me and was mad that I’d given out my email address and was talking to all those weird people. 8) I don’t think she actually took the time to read much of my emails or Eye Scene. That was when I tried to explain my feelings to her. She knew I was interested in vision and she knew I was planning on becoming an optometrist, but I don’t think she realized the depth of my feelings. I didn’t fully, either, until I started reading some of the Eye Scene postings. At one point she asked “It’s not like something kinky, is it?” I asked what she meant and she said “Well, I mean, you don’t want to take people with poor vision and, like, tie them up or something?” I quickly assured her that wasn’t what I meant (although now that I think of it.. But only if the person consented. 8) I certainly have no desire to harm anyone). But there is this other aspect that is nonsexual, but nonetheless strange (to most people). I just REALLY enjoy being with people who need glasses and talking about glasses and vision and being myopic myself.

II. Defining optic-obsession

Question: What does being an OO mean to you?

Answer: I’m definitely one of those OOs for whom it is a combination of physical and intellectual/emotional aspects (I think most of us are). I’m not totally “hardcore”, in that I’m not automatically attracted to anybody who wears glasses (though I do give all specs-wearers a second look - even the girls - because glasses just make a face so interesting to look at), also I have been attracted to people who don’t wear glasses (I’d say maybe 10% of the guys I’ve found attractive over my lifetime didn’t have glasses), so I would say that I’m primarily but not solely attracted to glasses-wearers.

III. What is it about glasses?

Question: How do you feel about lenses?

Answer: As far as plus vs. minus goes, my interest is about a 75%/25% split, with myopia and minus lenses predominating. My general outlook is "the stronger the better" for both types, though moderate and very high minus each have their own unique charms, and I am all but completely uninterested in very weak prescriptions, of 1.50 diopters or so in either direction (I find reading glasses particularly disappointing and frustrating - almost worse than no glasses at all! - though I am mildly interested in mild minus used just for driving and blackboards, etc., especially if the wearer is young enough to be likely to still be increasing in their myopia and/or if the wearer appears to be squinting and struggling to see with the glasses, indicating a need for stronger ones).

Here is something I posted to Eye Scene some time ago, slightly edited now:

I've been thinking about a way to show how a persons' bespectacledness (is that a word?) affects my perception of how attractive he/she is, so I made a sort of chart or scale showing how different specs affect me. As a baseline, I tend to look at everyone (the g-factor notwithstanding) as being, in ascending order:

1. Uninteresting

2. Interesting

3. Attractive

4. Hot

Now, from a just barely discernable rx (frames alone do nothing for me unless they’re my favorites*) up to a +/- 3 (on most anyone) moves one up a notch on my scale, everyone is at least interesting and an already hottie (without specs) becomes scorching.

A +/- 3-6 moves one 2 places up, so everyone’s attractive, the attractive-to-begin-withs are scorching and the hotties are boiling.

With a +/- 6-10 most anyone is hot to me, at least, going

1. Hot

2. Scorching

3. Boiling

4. Blistering

At +/- 10-20 we have

1. Scorching

2. Boiling

3. Blistering

4. Subnuclear

And from +/-20 on I am completely melted by the person’s intense optical power and rendered “helpless and stupefied” (anybody else remember the Nickelodeon cartoon “Doug” where Doug had a superhero alter ego named Quailman who would give villains “the Quail Eye”?)! Well, actually, this last is strictly theoretical, as I’ve never actually met anyone with this high an rx, but if I did, I’m sure that’s how I’d feel. I’ve come pretty close with a few Subnuclears!

* Added to this, whenever I see my fav frames (heavy, black horn-rims, ‘50‘s style), I tend to mentally add about 3D of correction to the glasses true rx (if any), so that even no-power lenses in this type of frame, will “act upon me” like around -3s and glasses with +/- .25-2.00 or so that might otherwise not interest me, will grab my attention when put in this type of frame. It’s like this saying I once heard “If a woman is wearing lipstick, men who look at her will unconsciously mentally raise the hem of her skirt 3 inches”.

When I see a pair of prescription sunglasses or tinted glasses, it sometimes piques my interest more than a clear pair of glasses in the same prescription would, but other times I think the glasses would look better clear (it depends on the rx in question and also on the frame style and color and lens tint and the person who is wearing them) and plano (fake, no power, like window-glass) lensed sunglasses do nothing for me, except as part of a blind person’s “image of blindness”.

Question: How do you feel about frames?

Answer: My personal favorites are thick, black plastic horn rims of the type Buddy Holly wore (my number 1 all-time favorite 8-) ), at the opposite end of the “spec”trum, rimless glasses look terrific with an rx that gives the lenses an adequate amount of thickness (at least about -3 to -6, depending on lens material, though plus lenses also look quite nice in rimless, the few times I’ve seen them), and then there’s my “best of both styles” favorite of half-rimless glasses with thick, black plastic frames up top and no frames on the bottom, old-fashioned, yeah but I love ’em in plus or minus. I personally don’t care much for drop-temples nor for the cat eye type (especially the rhinestone-studded variety that look like they got dropped into a Bedazzler, sorry but I just have to say “ewww” to the whole “dragon lady” look) nor for reading half-glasses (aside from being annoyed by people wearing glasses just for reading, I think the itsy bitsy rectangles perched halfway down one’s nose look terrible, though I can understand the practicality of having glasses that are convenient to glance up over top of in this situation). I also dislike aviator frames (the large, squareish glasses with double bridges that some men (mostly, though one does occasionally see a woman in them) wear, especially in plastic (which thankfully isn‘t common), though I did go to school with a boy who looked terrific in silver metal aviators with plus lenses. Now that I think of it, it seems most of the frames I dislike are those that are purely feminine styles (except for the double bridge jobbies) and I guess this makes sense since I’m a heterosexual woman who directs most of her “lens watching” towards males (though I think women look better with glasses than without as well; in nearly every case, a face without glasses looks blank and boring to me, and incomplete, like something’s missing). Or maybe it’s just that my tastes in general tend to run more towards the simple than the “fussy”. But there are plenty of other OOs who would vehemently disagree with me and sing the praises of drop-temples and rhinestone cat eyes, while dissing my beloved “black geeky nerd glasses”.

Like for most OOs, frames usually take on a secondary role in my interests, compared to lenses, but like any rule, this can be and often is broken. I DO get excited when I see my favorite black plastic frames, even with low rx or no rx lenses (see above “How do you feel about lenses?” for more on this).

Question: How do you feel about “glasses body language” and under/uncorrected vision problems?

Answer: I love it when a guy pushes up his glasses/fondles them frequently. The glasses cleaning ritual is nice to watch. Squinting is a really sweet thing to see, I can hardly decide which is better, someone in a beautiful pair of fairly strong glasses still squinting and struggling to see, obviously in need of a stronger prescription; or a totally uncorrected bare-eyed myope! I have an interest in both “going bare-eyed” (without correction) and seeing other myopes do it, but one problem with being a myopic OO who enjoys going bare-eyed is that YOU then miss out on all the great sightings of glasses (or obvious lacks thereof) because you yourself can’t see properly! Most of my fellow OOs would probably think me a traitor for saying this, but I’ve always found contact lenses to have a certain fascination for me, too (especially the whole in-out-clean-and-use-drops procedure) and then there’s the great “Nobody move! I’ve lost a contact!” Not quite as good as “Oh, no, I’ve lost my glasses!” but still entertaining. Eye exams are also very exciting to experience or hear about.

IV. Your own vision

Question: How do you feel about your own vision and glasses/lack of glasses?

Answer: There is also this matter of identity. I like thinking of myself as a myope and everything about it - the look and feel of frames on my face, the reflections of light and power rings, the “cut-in” effect, the “focused-in” feeling I get wearing my glasses, the clarity of vision I have with them, I even love the feel of my lenses through the cloth as I clean them! As stated above, I also enjoy just being nearsighted, living in the blur without glasses. I sometimes fantasize about what my life would be like if my vision wasn’t correctable. Yet there are so many things I love about wearing glasses, too. I would LOVE to be a real, permanent hi-my if I could and I’d be willing to have surgery to do it, if financial and other circumstances permitted. But first I would want to experiment with GOC at my intended rx (right now something in the low double-digits, say, -10 to -14, “looks” pretty good to me) for a long time to be SURE it’s what I wanted (kind of like how people who want to have sex-change operations are required to live as the opposite sex for one year before being considered eligible for surgery). I would also enjoy just playing around with different rxs for fun through GOC, extreme myopia (like -40!) as well as various degrees of hyperopia. So I guess I'm what I'd call an "automyophiliac" in the real-life sense and a "autohypermyophiliac" in fantasy.

There is one thing I sort of don't like about being an OO: Diopter Envy. Because I want so badly to be VERY, VERY nearsighted and wear super-strong glasses, I can get terribly jealous of high myopes, as well as admiring them. But I do feel grateful to be nearsighted at all-after all I could have been cursed with perfect vision, horror of horrors! I think if I were ever to decide to live a pure, ascetic life of self-denial, one of the first things I'd do would be to go and get L@$!K (excuse me for cursing) so I no longer had my glasses and blurry uncorrected sight to enjoy. I'm currently trying to work out a way to get stronger glasses than I need, to try to induce more myopia (I’m also doing lots of reading and computer work, but I’ve always been an incurable bookworm, anyway 8-) ) as well as simply for the pleasure of wearing stronger glasses and it is looking like I have a chance of reaching my goal naturally, that is, being able to wear the glasses I want to wear without needing + contacts underneath ( I'm not really trying to go to extremes, like myodiscs or biconcaves or anything, just something in the lower double digits, so I can get super-thick, plano-front lenses with lots of power rings and cut-in to die for (and hopefully, if I can actually increase the amount of myopia I have, so I can be super-blind without my glasses, not that I have an easy time without them now, but I can manage if I have to) ).

V. Why are we like this?

Question: What is your theory about why people become OOs/how you became one?

Answer: I have a few theories about the origins of my obsession:

1. I was adopted at 8 months old after having been grossly neglected (I was, in fact, nearly dead and not expected to live when I was first taken into foster care). My adoptive family was the first place I had stability and love, while from my biological family I had nothing but mistreatment. No one in my biological family wore glasses during the time I was with them, but nearly all of my adoptive relatives (including both parents) wore them full-time. Hence, perhaps I came to conclude that people who wore glasses were safer to be around and could be counted on to treat me better than people without them. It’s even possible my preference for minus lenses as opposed to plus comes from the fact that my mother, who was mostly responsible for raising me, was myopic, while my father, who more-or-less ignored me, was hyperopic.
    

2. Another possibility is that my feeling of inferiority to others, particularly males, which results in jealousy and a fear of being dominated by someone stronger, feeds my OOness because I feel more in control and less dominated by a man who has the weakness of poor eyesight and the knowledge that I can easily disable him simply by taking away his glasses (though I never really would) gives me a sense of security and power.
    

3. My obsession with vision defects and their correction by glasses could simply be an outgrowth of my obsession with blindness, which in turn I trace back to the fact that my mother went blind for a couple years due to Multiple Sclerosis when I was a young girl. I had dualistic feelings towards this happening - on the one hand, I had a sense of pride in what I could do to help her and some feelings of curiosity and fascination about what it was like for her, as well as some identification with her which led to my imitating her by blindfolding myself and trying to go about the house doing ordinary things that way. On the other hand, was a sense of fear that going blind could happen to me, too and I think I initially started reading about vision problems as a way of feeding the fascination while calming the fear.
    

4. The fact that I am myopic myself probably has something to do with my OOness, though of course, most myopes don’t turn out to be OOs (“Mama’s, don’t let your myopes grow up to be OOs”, sorry, I couldn’t resist! 8-} ) and there are some OOs who are hyperopic, as well as some with perfect vision. I endured a long period of ever-increasing, uncorrected myopia as a child and young adolescent, which was a great source of embarrassment to me and there is a theory that anything that results in humiliation can be the basis for a fetish (I have another fetish which can be based in humiliation for some people, though I haven’t thoroughly analyzed its “cause” for me personally yet). Then again, part of the reason I went uncorrected for so long was that I refused to admit I needed glasses, partly because I found it embarrassing (hence, a vicious circle)!

VI. Female fetishists

Question: What have your personal experiences/observations of female optic-obsessives been (would especially like feedback from other OO girls on this one!)?

Answer: I pretty much covered this in the original text, so I'll just add a few personal notes here. The way my OOness expresses itself is primarily in fantasy, reading and writing stories, though I do enjoy my own visual situation and glasses. My physical OO activities are largely limited by circumstances at this point in my life, but I think if they were not I would be experimenting with GOC and building a glasses collection. As for more directly sexual activities, this is also unfortunately not something I have had much chance to delve into (in fact, I'm actually still a virgin, so I suppose some of you will say I don't know what I'm talking about, but as I said, these are just my observations from attentively listening to people and watching and reading), though I truly don't think I could ever settle for a long-term romantic/sexual relationship with a man who has good vision. I think that if I ever do marry, it will most certainly be a high myope (or possibly a high hyperope, but more likely a myope).

But as for the one sexual activity I do participate in, when I masturbate I sometimes have fantasies related specifically to my glasses fetish, a favorite being that I am a bit more nearsighted then I really am and have had to come to a class without my glasses for some reason. The instructor asks me to read something from the board or overhead projector and I explain that I can't because I don't have my glasses and can't see. He tells me I can move down to the front of the room and I have to say "I'm afraid that won't help much. You see, I'm VERY nearsighted. I can hardly even see to read my textbook" and I demonstrate how I have to hold the book just inches away from my face to read it. The instructor is utterly shocked at how blind I am. When this sort of thing actually used to happen to me, I'd nearly die of embarrassment, but now it seems erotic. Sometimes I will take my glasses off before I masturbate (though I probably wear them while I do it 3/4 of the time) and enjoy gazing into the blur, thinking about how bad my eyes are, sometimes I'll lay my glasses down where I can see them fairly well, but not totally clearly, and admire, through that bit of blur, the thickness of the lenses and the way the light plays on them (I set them at an angle that emphasizes this), so I can enjoy both parts of my fetish at once! I also like to touch my glasses with my free hand (whether or not I'm wearing them) while I touch myself, I always come very hard if I'm doing this at the moment of orgasm.

I picture all sorts of vision-related scenarios: an eye exam where I or someone else is getting glasses for the first time or new, stronger ones, or squinting and struggling to see something without glasses or with ones that are too weak (although they're really strong), or doing something that makes the glasses slip so they have to be constantly pushed back up (like being on top in a sweaty sex session), or losing or breaking their glasses and having to cope with their blur, which because I'm a hypermyophiliac (one who loves very nearsighted people-hyper=much, very; myo=myopia, nearsightedness; philiac=one who loves, is attracted to/aroused by) in particular, as well as enjoying lower myopes and hyperopes to some extent, often amounts to blindness (this one is super-hot to me, it's like a perfect blend of hypermyophilia and amaurophilia (attraction to blindness), which I also have).

VII. Other fetishes

Question: How do you think OO compares to other fetishes/do you have any other fetishes?

Answer: I myself am one of the “weird ones” who has a number of unusual preferences and sources of excitement. Some of the other fetishes that have occurred in other OOs are ones I share as well, including: blindness/uncorrectable visual impairment, general nerd fetish and general interest in BDSM (though this isn’t technically a fetish). I am also perhaps in a unique position when it comes to considering disability fetish in comparison to optic-obsession: I have spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and use a wheelchair, but I don’t have any fetish or special interest in orthopedic impairments/devices. My feelings towards those who might desire me because of my disability are mixed-part of me finds it hard to believe that something I always considered a deficit (and a major one at that) in terms of my sexual attractiveness ranking could really be an asset, part of me is a little “weirded out” by the idea (“He actually LIKES that I have these problems and can’t do all these things?! If something came along that could cure me and make me “normal” he’d be acutely disappointed, possibly not even sufficiently attracted to me to stay with me anymore?! How weird!”); but part of me understands, due to the fact that this is exactly how I feel towards people with vision defects (being a -4 myope I am a “target” of this fetish, too, but I feel differently about being “targeted” by an OO, since I’ve always had positive feelings toward my own myopia, as well as others’) and is almost eager to embrace the “beauty of my disability”.

I also have another major fetish which is completely different from my optic-obsession and actually my biggest turn-on of all from a purely get-me-to-orgasm viewpoint, if you must know, it’s omorashi (which simply put, means I get aroused from having or imagining I have a full bladder (I TOLD you I was weird! ) ), the name comes from Japanese for “to wet one’s self“, since the final moments of desperation and ultimate loss of control are the most exciting part for most people with this fetish (including me), though unlike some people with this fetish I DON’T want to have somebody else pee on me or make me drink their pee or anything gross like that (sorry if I offended anyone who likes this sort of thing *trying to stretch mind a bit wider open*). My omorashi is strictly a sexual interest, it does not give me any kind of emotional or intellectual satisfaction, the way my OOness does. I do read websites concerning omorashi, but only when I'm specifically seeking out sexual stimulation, once that urge has been satisfied, I'm no longer interested and I have never written, nor do I desire to write wetting stories. In "When Someone You Love Loves Glasses" I discussed a difference between "fetish" and "obsession" and this illustrates it well: I have a fairly strong omorashi fetish, but I'm not obsessed with peeing at all. Another difference between this and my OO is that while my OO is completely "switchable", meaning I enjoy equally my own myopia and glasses and the refractive errors and glasses of others, my omorashi is completely "self-directed", it's only my own desperation I'm interested in, when reading stories I always transpose things and imagine myself in the main character's situation.

My blindness fetish is the more general "obsession" type of thing, though not to the degree my interest in lesser visual defects is, I do get off on pretending to be blind and/or pretending my partner is (there is more "switchability" here, though I still lean slightly on the side of "self-directedness", I get a little more excited thinking of being blind myself, though sometimes the ultimate turn-on is thinking of being half of a blind couple (I also like the idea of being half of a bespectacled couple and hope to make that dream a reality one day) ), probably a little less so then the full bladder thing but a little more so than the glasses thing (though to some degree I find my OO and my blindness thing intertwined in my mind, I especially am intrigued by the "blurring" of the line between very high myopia and blindness). So I only have 2 "obsessions", the optic-obsession being the most important with a secondary blindness obsession (if indeed, it is a separate thing, though I'm thinking it might really be more like the difference between my interest in plus vs. minus glasses, or spexy vs. bare-eyed myopes, just different facets of the same basic thing), but many "fetishes", with omorashi being the prime one, followed by blindness fetish ("amaurophilia" is the technical word for this, I looked it up :-) ), fetish for refractive errors coming in third, followed by a number of "minor fetishes".

My “minor fetishes” include an undoing of buttons fetish and a necklace fetish (no, guys in necklaces are not girly, they are HOT! Can‘t you just imagine having a nice, cool little strand of metal to chew on while you kiss his neck?), both of which I can actually trace the genesis of to a single photograph of a guy I had a crush on wearing a half-way unbuttoned shirt (didn't take a lot of imagination to "undress him with my eyes", from the waist up, anyway, maybe that's why guys wear shirts half-undone like that?) with no undershirt and a necklace underneath it. This picture sparked many a fantasy, which always began with me slowly undoing the remaining buttons, kissing and caressing each newly revealed area of flesh as I went, stopping at his neck to nibble on his necklace while kissing his throat. This has gotten to the point where I no longer have to actually imagine touching the guy to get excited, just the thought of watching him unbutton his shirt in front of me (or even seeing someone unbutton their shirt on TV) excites me, beyond the usual excitement of watching a guy undress, by just pulling his shirt over his head. The idea of having this done to me while I wear a button-down shirt and a necklace also gets me going, but I'm more "other-directed" on these 2 fetishes (it doesn't necessarily have to be both at once, I like either by itself, it's just that the 2 fetishes formed together and the combo REALLY does it for me). Also, it kind of ruins it if the guy has an undershirt on underneath (who wants to kiss a cotton/polyester blend!? Sorry if I offended any fabric fetishists out there). The difference here when compared to my OO is that while glasses in-and-of-themselves do have some erotic power for me (at least if they're the right kind) in addition to me being attracted to people who need them (which came first? Well, the chicken came from the egg which came from the chicken which...), I have no special interest in buttoned clothing or necklaces outside of a sexual context, I don't even always notice every guy who wears them, so I'm not attracted to guys who wear these things so much as they're things I want the guy I'm attracted to to wear, if you understand the difference.

I also have a couple "minor fetishes" that I'm not sure even count as such, since they're closely related to the "normal" sexual pattern. I have an impregnation fetish (though in real-life I’m not at all sure I ever want to have kids) and a “horny guy fetish” (or maybe everybody finds the idea of someone of the opposite sex (or same, whichever way your gate swings) being super-horny to be a turn-on). I suppose really my OO is a kind of "mixed fetish", my other fetishes are all "action fetishes", in that I'm turned on by what the guy (or I) do (even the necklace/buttons are simply a prop for action and so not a true "object fetish"), my amaurophilia is a "state of being" or "type of person fetish" (I don't get excited over white canes or Braille books by themselves, only seeing them being used/imagining myself using them), but my OO is a combination "state of being/type of person fetish" (I like myopes and hyperopes, whether with glasses, bare-eyed or yes, even with contacts (if I know what's really there underneath, hey, they have to come out some time!) and a "classical fetish" or "object fetish", what most people typically think of when they think of fetishes, meaning I can also be turned-on just seeing a pair of glasses by themselves.

To further complicate things, I also have a "preference" that I don't consider a fetish, though I'm not sure if it's because it's really a different sort of thing from a fetish at the root of it or if it's simply the kind of thing I've been taught is a "normal preference" - I like guys who have dyed blond hair that's really obviously dyed, with plenty of dark roots showing, it somehow gives them a sort of "trashy" look that I like, but then this does have a connection to my OO, because I have certain little "looks" that are combos of coloring/body type and glasses that I like together, often because they remind me of certain "eyewear icons" I've known, in real-life or the world of celebrities. For instance, I like slender, long-faced fellows with longish dark hair and moderate minus lenses in round metal frames, like John Lennon; tall, gangly guys with an over-all "cute nerd" look, brown eyes and curly brown hair wearing my favorite frames (must I describe them again?) with strongish minus lenses, like Buddy Holly; and guys with natural pale blond hair and blue eyes behind moderate to strong plus glasses in a metal frame (I like metal frames in general better than plastic for plusses, don't know why), like Jeff J., the boy I had a crush on in 4th grade (Roy Orbison would've qualified for this if he hadn't dyed his hair dark and got his lenses tinted, although there's something I like about his look also, though I haven't met anyone in real-life who quite captures it)! Is it totally weird to use dead people as your erotic models? If it is, I must be weird (who would've guessed?).

I tend to want to keep my omorashi separate from everything else, but aside from that I do like the idea of mixing fetishes, like the thought of being impregnated by a super-horny guy wearing a button-down shirt and a necklace while one of us is blind (either completely through use of a blindfold or blind contacts, or functionally from an uncorrected high refractive error) and the other is wearing super-strong glasses!!!

Maybe I went on too long about all my other fetishes here (not to mention all of you out there reading this have probably started singing Rick James' "Super freak" ("She's a very kinky girl...) under your breath), but I found the contrast between my various other fetishes and my optic obsession to be interesting. It really points out how unique optic obsession really is, "honored among fetishes", as I like to think of it.

BACK